Counting tells you how often behavior happens, not how long it lasts, how fast it starts, or how it is spaced. For many goals, time is the dimension that matters.
Why it matters
Imagine a learner whose tantrums drop from four per day to two, while each one now lasts 40 minutes instead of 5. A count says things improved; the family's evening says otherwise. Or think of a teenager who follows every instruction, but only after a two-minute delay. Their compliance count is perfect, and the problem is invisible.
Time-based measures let you see these patterns. As a BCBA you will choose them, write the rules for using them, and judge whether the resulting data are trustworthy.
Key ideas
- Two time-based dimensional quantities. Every response takes up some amount of time (temporal extent) and happens at some point in time relative to other events (temporal locus).
- Duration measures temporal extent.
- Latency and IRT measure temporal locus.
- Duration can be summarized two ways.
- Total duration per session: add up the time across all occurrences. Use it when the concern is how much of the session the behavior fills, or when responses are hard to separate (on-task behavior, play with peers).
- Duration per occurrence: time each episode separately and report the mean or median. Use it when you care about how long each episode lasts, such as tantrums or time spent at a work station.
- Latency is about responsiveness. It runs from the onset of an antecedent stimulus, usually an instruction or cue, to the onset of the response. Goals can aim to shorten latency (starting tasks after a direction) or lengthen it (pausing before answering an impulsive question).
- IRT is about spacing. It runs between two successive responses of the same behavior, typically from the end of one response to the start of the next. Shorter IRTs go with a higher rate, and longer IRTs go with a lower rate. IRT is also the measure behind a spaced-responding DRL schedule, which reinforces a response only when enough time has passed since the last one.
- Clear onset and offset rules are not optional. Every time-based measure starts and stops a clock. If observers disagree about when a behavior begins or ends, their numbers will not agree.
- These are continuous measures. Like count and rate, duration, latency, and IRT capture every occurrence during the observation period, so they are not estimates the way interval data are.
Definitions
- Duration: the amount of time from the onset to the offset of a response.
- Response latency: the time from the onset of a stimulus to the onset of the response it is meant to occasion.
- Interresponse time (IRT): the time between two successive responses of the same class. Some researchers time IRT from the onset of one response to the onset of the next, so check how a study defines it.
- Temporal extent: the fact that every response occupies some amount of time.
- Temporal locus: the fact that every response occurs at a certain point in time relative to other events.
Examples from a session
Matching the measure to the goal
- Home, age 4: Mateo's tantrums vary from 1 to 25 minutes. The BCBA times each episode and graphs the mean duration per occurrence, because the family's main concern is how long each one lasts.
- Elementary school, age 9: Grace's teacher wants her engaged in group reading for more of the 20-minute block. An observer runs a stopwatch while Grace meets the engagement definition and pauses it when she does not, giving total duration per session.
- Clinic, age 13: Dev begins tasks an average of 90 seconds after a direction. The RBT starts a timer as soon as she gives the direction and stops it when Dev picks up his pencil. The goal is a latency under 15 seconds.
- Adult group home, age 41: Lorraine eats very quickly, which raises her risk of choking. Staff record the seconds from the end of one bite (her fork leaves her mouth) to the start of the next (her fork touches the food again). The goal is to lengthen IRT.
- Non-example, no clock rules: Two staff note that Bea's crying lasted "about 10 minutes" and "a few minutes." With no onset or offset rule and no timer, this is an impression, not duration data.
Each example names exactly when the clock starts and stops, which makes the data usable by a second observer.
Common mistakes / exam traps
- Timing from instruction to completion. Starting the clock at the cue and stopping it when the task is finished mixes latency and task duration into one number. If it improves, you cannot tell whether the learner started faster, worked faster, or both. Record them separately.
- Choosing count for behavior that varies in length. If episodes are long, uneven, or hard to separate, a count hides most of the change. Duration usually fits better.
- Using duration for brief, discrete responses. Timing a 1-second hand raise adds little; count or rate is the better fit.
- Forgetting that the summary matters. Total duration and mean duration per occurrence can move in opposite directions. Fewer but longer episodes can raise the mean while total duration falls, because total duration equals count times mean duration per occurrence.
Exam trap
Latency vs. IRT. Both measure temporal locus, so both "time the wait before a response." The discriminating feature is what starts the clock: latency starts at an antecedent stimulus such as an instruction, and IRT starts at the previous response of the same behavior. If no cue starts the clock, it is not latency.
Exam trap
Duration vs. latency vs. IRT. Read the goal first, then the stem. "How long" points to duration. "How quickly after the cue" points to latency. "How much time between responses" or a spaced-responding DRL criterion points to IRT.
Quick check
Nia, an RBT, starts a timer when Theo, 6, puts down his crayon after coloring one picture and stops it when he picks up a crayon to start the next. What is Nia measuring?
Related topics
- Measuring occurrence: count, rate, and percentage (C.3)
- Writing operational definitions (C.1)
- Continuous vs. discontinuous measurement (C.5)
- Choosing a measure that captures the critical dimension within real-world limits (C.9)
- Differential reinforcement (DRA, DRO, DRL, DRH) with and without extinction (G.2)